Article in today's Journal regarding the additional tolling of the case before the PSC. According to Allegheny's spokesman, it's a matter of when, not if. Huh? He trots out this canned comment and then never does say when "when" will be. Never, perhaps? Who's on first? That's almost as good as the old "align the decision dates in all three states" comment. Allegheny needs some fresh ideas.
Allegheny has also embarked on an ad campaign regarding the issue (!) to compete with StopPATH's ad campaign. There's about a $million$ differences between the two -- StopPATH is paying for their own advertising while PATH is charging electric ratepayers in 13 states for their ad campaign (and making a 14.3% profit on every dollar they spend). YOU get to pay to watch or read PATH's commercials/advertisements, doesn't that sound equitable?
Sometimes, you just can't compete.
Allegheny has also embarked on an ad campaign regarding the issue (!) to compete with StopPATH's ad campaign. There's about a $million$ differences between the two -- StopPATH is paying for their own advertising while PATH is charging electric ratepayers in 13 states for their ad campaign (and making a 14.3% profit on every dollar they spend). YOU get to pay to watch or read PATH's commercials/advertisements, doesn't that sound equitable?
Sometimes, you just can't compete.
RSS Feed